Series editor's foreword |
|
ix | |
Acknowledgements |
|
xi | |
Introduction |
|
1 | (2) |
1 The rise of risk |
|
3 | (23) |
|
|
3 | (5) |
|
|
4 | (4) |
|
|
8 | (1) |
|
Late modernity and the risk society: new risks or new ways of looking at risk? |
|
|
8 | (7) |
|
The contention that the distinction between traditional and late modern risks is overstated |
|
|
10 | (1) |
|
The thesis that risks are under-regulated and weakened social control of technology has contributed to risk proliferation is incorrect |
|
|
11 | (2) |
|
The claim that the end of traditional bonds exacerbates risk is overstated |
|
|
13 | (1) |
|
The multiplication of risk is overemphasized |
|
|
14 | (1) |
|
|
14 | (1) |
|
|
15 | (10) |
|
The demise of the modernist agenda |
|
|
16 | (2) |
|
Postmodernity and the rise of risk |
|
|
18 | (6) |
|
|
24 | (1) |
|
|
25 | (1) |
2 The role of risk in criminal justice and penal policy |
|
26 | (22) |
|
Introducing the new penality |
|
|
26 | (2) |
|
The rise of risk and actuarial justice |
|
|
28 | (12) |
|
Theoretical approaches: class versus governmentality |
|
|
29 | (2) |
|
|
31 | (1) |
|
|
32 | (1) |
|
Risk avoidance and the 'management of bads' |
|
|
33 | (1) |
|
Risk and the role of modern thought |
|
|
34 | (1) |
|
Economic crime management and actuarial risk practices |
|
|
35 | (1) |
|
New right crime policies, advanced liberalism and risk |
|
|
36 | (4) |
|
|
40 | (1) |
|
Punitive sovereignty and the place of risk |
|
|
40 | (7) |
|
|
41 | (2) |
|
Sovereign state strategies |
|
|
43 | (3) |
|
|
46 | (1) |
|
|
47 | (1) |
3 Approaches to risk and risk assessment tools |
|
48 | (33) |
|
Introduction: approaches to risk and the 'two cultures' |
|
|
48 | (8) |
|
|
49 | (5) |
|
|
54 | (2) |
|
|
56 | (1) |
|
Epistemologies of risk and risk management |
|
|
56 | (8) |
|
Artefact risk and homeostatic risk management |
|
|
56 | (5) |
|
Social risk and negotiated risk management |
|
|
61 | (2) |
|
|
63 | (1) |
|
|
64 | (8) |
|
|
64 | (3) |
|
Third generation tools: the introduction of criminogenic need |
|
|
67 | (4) |
|
|
71 | (1) |
|
The challenge of sexual and violent offenders |
|
|
72 | (7) |
|
Sexual offenders and relevant tools |
|
|
72 | (3) |
|
Violent offenders and relevant tools |
|
|
75 | (4) |
|
|
79 | (1) |
|
|
80 | (1) |
4 Risk, dangerousness and the Probation Service |
|
81 | (22) |
|
|
81 | (1) |
|
|
82 | (1) |
|
The legislative and policy context: the Probation Service and the 'discovery' of the dangerous offender |
|
|
82 | (11) |
|
The Criminal Justice Act 1991 and the emergence of public protection |
|
|
83 | (2) |
|
|
85 | (1) |
|
From dangerous to predatory: the rise of the predatory paedophile |
|
|
86 | (6) |
|
|
92 | (1) |
|
Risk and Multi-Agency Public Protection Panels |
|
|
93 | (6) |
|
Multi-Agency Public Protection Panels |
|
|
93 | (1) |
|
Key legislation and policy developments |
|
|
94 | (2) |
|
Professional judgement versus actuarial tool |
|
|
96 | (1) |
|
Risk classification and risk thresholds |
|
|
97 | (1) |
|
Professional values and occupational culture |
|
|
98 | (1) |
|
|
98 | (1) |
|
Conclusion: risk and rehabilitation in Probation transformation or accommodation? |
|
|
99 | (3) |
|
The emergence of a 'new rehabilitationism' |
|
|
99 | (2) |
|
|
101 | (1) |
|
|
102 | (1) |
5 Risk and policing |
|
103 | (22) |
|
|
103 | (2) |
|
Late modern policing: transformation or continuity? |
|
|
105 | (10) |
|
Has public policing changed? |
|
|
109 | (1) |
|
Post-Keynesian policing: rhetoric or reality? |
|
|
110 | (4) |
|
|
114 | (1) |
|
|
115 | (8) |
|
Risk and community policing |
|
|
115 | (1) |
|
Partnership and community |
|
|
116 | (2) |
|
The rhetoric and the reality |
|
|
118 | (1) |
|
Intelligence-led policing |
|
|
119 | (2) |
|
|
121 | (2) |
|
Conclusion: new risks, new policing? |
|
|
123 | (1) |
|
|
124 | (1) |
6 Risk and crime prevention |
|
125 | (18) |
|
|
125 | (2) |
|
Crime prevention as a risk-based discourse |
|
|
127 | (2) |
|
Third way crime prevention |
|
|
128 | (1) |
|
Community and communitarianism |
|
|
129 | (2) |
|
|
131 | (4) |
|
Legitimacy and responsibility |
|
|
132 | (1) |
|
The extension of the private sphere |
|
|
133 | (1) |
|
Tensions arising from the demands of managerialism |
|
|
133 | (1) |
|
|
134 | (1) |
|
Crime prevention in practice |
|
|
135 | (3) |
|
Extending the net of social control |
|
|
137 | (1) |
|
|
137 | (1) |
|
Alternatives to risk: possible futures |
|
|
138 | (3) |
|
The 'privatized fortress cities' model |
|
|
138 | (1) |
|
The 'authoritarian statist-communitarian' model |
|
|
139 | (1) |
|
The 'inclusive civic, safe cities' model |
|
|
139 | (2) |
|
|
141 | (1) |
|
Conclusion: is crime prevention a risky business? |
|
|
141 | (1) |
|
|
142 | (1) |
7 Concluding comments |
|
143 | (4) |
|
Pulling the threads together |
|
|
143 | (2) |
|
|
145 | (2) |
Glossary |
|
147 | (2) |
References |
|
149 | (32) |
Index |
|
181 | |